I don’t think there are as many sexual advantages for women to say they are atheists.
Hurr hurr, “sexual advantages”? I know of no scientific studies dealing specifically with the sexual prowess of atheists as compared to theists. If any of you guys do, please let me know. I’d be very interested in the results.
(A conjecture though: a strong correlation of atheism with more progressive and science-based views on human sexuality could mean that atheists do indeed have better sex lives, or, to put it bluntly, it’s moar fun to have oral sex when you don’t have to think about a bearded yet invisible omniscient deity with voyerism kink)
For a man, staking a claim in defiance of God and society can turn heads. For women, it’s just bitchy. Sad, but true.
Atheism is by no means “defiance to Dog”. You can’t defy something in which you don’t believe it exists, because there is no proof that it does.
Also, that “it’s bitchy” is, sadly, the commenter’s opinion projected on the society in which he or she lives. Again, I know of no actual scientific study reviewing the attitudes of public opinion towards female and male atheists. The commenter probably doesn’t know of such a study either.
Did she/he had a great time pulling anecdata from his/her arse? We will never know.
PERSONALLY, I’d think that for women the clear and obvious advantage of not having a powerful organisation policing our sexuality and our gender roles, and rationalising it with a swift yet effective “DOG SAID SO QED” would be an awesome enough.
Frankly, I don’t understand how a woman could prefer to be oppressed by another sexist religious organisation at all.
(1) I know, I know; looking for stupid comments on the internets is like trying to nuke a fish in a barrel, but seriously. I JUST CAN’T RESIST.